Eduardo Inda has gone viral on social media for a huge blunder on El Chiringuito.
It was about signing another chapter in the strategy to demonstrate that referees harm Real Madrid and benefit Barça.
Josep Pedrerol gave him the floor to drop the bomb on the show that Florentino Pérez likes the most for its objectivity.
"Like Jack the Ripper"
"I have a report with photos, of course. Let's see, in parts, like Jack the Ripper."
"This is Martínez Munuera (and shows a photo). Here we have the form that all referees had to fill out when the Negreira case broke out.
"And Martínez Munuera, who referees in my hometown, at El Sadar, last Saturday. He states that Javier Enríquez was his coach during the 2015-16 season, paying him 1,200 euros for six matches".
"Munuera harms Madrid (shows the photo again) by action and Melero López harms Madrid by omission."
"I think it's all very clear, isn't it? They are the Negreiros".
And Eduardo Inda concludes his task there. Investigative journalism, De Luxe journalism at the service of Real Madrid.
"Show the Photo of the First Referee"
Juanfe Sanz, instead of applauding him for the task, asks him to show the photo of the first referee. And he takes it.
"This gentleman you show to the camera is named Juan Martínez Munuera".
"Yes," says Inda.
"This gentleman is Valencian..."
"And what do I care," Inda responds in his usual tone.
"And he refereed the Atlético de Madrid match. The Osasuna-Real Madrid match was refereed by José Luis Munuera Montero, who is from Jaén".
Inda didn't care if the person in the photo was his corrupt Munuera or someone else. Don't let reality ruin a good headline. But he was left with a poker face.
[IMAGE]{860752}[/IMAGE]
Two Years Without a Single Piece of Evidence on Match Fixing
It's not surprising that with investigative journalism of this type we still don't have a single piece of evidence to talk about match fixing. And that's even though the matter was uncovered in Barcelona (not in Madrid) two years ago.
And it won't be because the Civil Guard, the prosecutor's office, and good investigative journalism haven't looked for it.
But here we are, like the shell game operator, showing a photo that isn't to slip in a lie. And, above all, applauding. They are the feelings that Tomás Roncero talks about.
They need to prepare the papers better to make it seem credible. Botched jobs, no, as Pedrerol would say.